Jakarta - Internet technology that lead to developing a new lifestyle, including the development of content. Unfortunately, many developers content including blogs that have not yet know that his work is protected by law when dikomersilkan.
According to Andi Noorsaman Sommeng, Director General of the Department of Property Rights Law and Human Rights, the profits from developing content on the internet can indeed berpromosi free. Still, the creators can only prosecute the people who commercialize the content buatannya.
"What rights will be taken they take, but if the creator does not want to prosecute not do anything," he said, on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Symposium World Intelectual Property Organization, which takes place at the Mercure Hotel Ancol, Jakarta.
Rights are protected under Law 19 of 2002 on Copyright, the threat maximum fine of Rp 5 billion and a month in jail. "So there is a publication that, without the need to register • DEPKUMHAM perlindungannya already there," Andi supplement.
Unfortunately, other than the ringback tone content developers, content developers many other bloggers still have not been particularly aware that his work is protected by law. "It is not yet well, the problem of the people of Indonesia and many geographically separated. Hence this symposium aims to create public awarness that, "said Andi.
This law is the product while protecting foreign downloaded through the Internet. "Haki this law applies to members of WIPO because resiprokal system. If we protect their product, the product we also protected by the Law on them, "he continued.
WIPO is an organization under the auspices of the United Nations the right to manage the Intellectual Property (IP). This organization has 180 members around the country.
The symposium itself Andi claimed as the first in the world. Selection of Indonesia as the host because it is based because the U.S. considered superior in the development of content compared to other countries.
"You see, if indeed we lose the software with our hardware, while India lost to Singapore. But if Indonesia ideally in the content, try the song-hardened players who often played in other countries, that can be protected, "Andi umbar.
Meanwhile, WIPO consultant for the Asia Pacific Candra N. Darusman said, so far in Indonesia have not been many reports of violations related to User Generated Content (UGC). "But this issue will be dominant in the next 5 years. The most protected are the creator of songs, and recording companies who have content, "Andi also
diterjemahkan dari http://away.blogsome.com/2008/02/21/bloger-ayo-lindungi-karyamu/
dengan google translate
Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Friday, February 29, 2008
e-government
from wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Government
e-Government (from electronic government, also known as e-gov, digital government, online government or in a certain context transformational government) refers to government’s use of information technology to exchange information and services with citizens, businesses, and other arms of government. e-Government may be applied by the legislature, judiciary, or administration, in order to improve internal efficiency, the delivery of public services, or processes of democratic governance. The primary delivery models are Government-to-Citizen or Government-to-Customer (G2C), Government-to-Business (G2B) and Government-to-Government (G2G) & Government-to-Employees (G2E).
Within each of these interaction domains, four kind of activities take place[1] The simplest type of activity is to provide information over the Internet, such as regulatory services, general holidays, public hearing schedules, issue briefs, notifications, etc. The second type of activity allows two-way communicationsbetween the agency and the citizen, a business, or another government agency. In this model, users can engage in dialogue with agencies and post problems, comments, or requests to the agency. The third form of activity that takes place over the Internet involves conducting transactions. The final and fourth form of activity that takes over the web centres on governance, e.g., online polling, voting, and campaigning.
The most important anticipated benefits of e-government include improved efficiency, convenience, and better accessibility of public services.
While e-government is often thought of as "online government" or "Internet-based government," many non-Internet "electronic government" technologies can be used in this context. Some non-internet forms include telephone, fax, PDA, SMS text messaging, MMS, wireless networks and services, Bluetooth, CCTV, tracking systems, RFID, biometric identification, road traffic management and regulatory enforcement, identity cards, smart cards and other NFC applications; polling station technology (where non-online e-voting is being considered), TV and radio-based delivery of government services, email, online community facilities, newsgroups and electronic mailing lists, online chat, and instant messaging technologies. There are also some technology-specific sub-categories of e-government, such as m-government (mobile government), u-government (ubiquitous government), and g-government (GIS/GPS applications for e-government).
There are many considerations and potential implications of implementing and designing e-government, including disintermediation of the government and its citizens, impacts on economic, social, and political factors, and disturbances to the status quo in these areas.
In countries such as the United Kingdom, there is interest in using electronic government to re-engage citizens with the political process. In particular, this has taken the form of experiments with electronic voting, aiming to increase voter turnout by making voting easy. The UK Electoral Commission has undertaken several pilots, though concern has been expressed about the potential for fraud with some electronic voting methods[2].
Contents
[hide]
* 1 History of E-Government
* 2 Development and implementation issues
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 5 External links
o 5.1 eGovernment news websites
o 5.2 General resources
[edit] History of E-Government
[edit] Development and implementation issues
The development and implementation of e-government involves consideration of its effects on the organisation of the public sector (Cordella, 2007) and on the nature of the services provided by the state including environmental, social, cultural, educational, and consumer issues, among others.
Governments may need to consider the impact by gender, age, language skills, and cultural diversity, as well as the effect on literacy, numeracy, education standards and IT literacy. Economic concerns include the "Digital divide," or the effect of non-use, non-availability or inaccessibility of e-government, or of other digital resources, upon the structure of society, and the potential impact on income and economics.
Economic and revenue-related concerns include e-government's effect on taxation, debt, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), commerce and trade, corporate governance, and its effect on non-e-government business practices, industry and trade, especially Internet Service Providers and Internet infrastructure.
From a technological standpoint, the implementation of e-government has effects on e-enablement, interoperability (e.g., e-GIF) and semantic web issues, "legacy technology" (making "pre-eGovernment IT" work together with or be replaced by e-government systems), and implications for software choices (between open source and proprietary software, and between programming languages) as well as political blogging especially by legislators.
There are also management issues related to service integration, local e-government, and Internet governance including ICANN, IETF and W3C, and financial considerations, such as the cost of implementation / effect on existing budgets, effect on government procurement, and funding.
Legal implications include freedom of information and privacy (e.g. UK Data Protection Act) concerns.
The phrase "e-government" has been a rallying cry for public sector modernization since the 90's, but for many it is now losing its appeal as a slogan or concept. This trend has various drivers. Firstly, there is a wish to mainstream e-government so that best use of technology is integrated into all public sector activity rather than seen as a special interest or add-on. Secondly, many administrations recognise the importance of linking e-government to wider public sector change programmes. Thirdly, the phrase e-government is itself not particularly useful in motivating a change programme. These sorts of considerations have led countries such as the UK to talk of transformational government rather than e-government. Finally, there is the issue of the implications for the public sector of Web 2.0 [3]. All these considerations suggest that e-government is entering a new phase and one in which the term "e-government" is itself becoming less popular.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Government
e-Government (from electronic government, also known as e-gov, digital government, online government or in a certain context transformational government) refers to government’s use of information technology to exchange information and services with citizens, businesses, and other arms of government. e-Government may be applied by the legislature, judiciary, or administration, in order to improve internal efficiency, the delivery of public services, or processes of democratic governance. The primary delivery models are Government-to-Citizen or Government-to-Customer (G2C), Government-to-Business (G2B) and Government-to-Government (G2G) & Government-to-Employees (G2E).
Within each of these interaction domains, four kind of activities take place[1] The simplest type of activity is to provide information over the Internet, such as regulatory services, general holidays, public hearing schedules, issue briefs, notifications, etc. The second type of activity allows two-way communicationsbetween the agency and the citizen, a business, or another government agency. In this model, users can engage in dialogue with agencies and post problems, comments, or requests to the agency. The third form of activity that takes place over the Internet involves conducting transactions. The final and fourth form of activity that takes over the web centres on governance, e.g., online polling, voting, and campaigning.
The most important anticipated benefits of e-government include improved efficiency, convenience, and better accessibility of public services.
While e-government is often thought of as "online government" or "Internet-based government," many non-Internet "electronic government" technologies can be used in this context. Some non-internet forms include telephone, fax, PDA, SMS text messaging, MMS, wireless networks and services, Bluetooth, CCTV, tracking systems, RFID, biometric identification, road traffic management and regulatory enforcement, identity cards, smart cards and other NFC applications; polling station technology (where non-online e-voting is being considered), TV and radio-based delivery of government services, email, online community facilities, newsgroups and electronic mailing lists, online chat, and instant messaging technologies. There are also some technology-specific sub-categories of e-government, such as m-government (mobile government), u-government (ubiquitous government), and g-government (GIS/GPS applications for e-government).
There are many considerations and potential implications of implementing and designing e-government, including disintermediation of the government and its citizens, impacts on economic, social, and political factors, and disturbances to the status quo in these areas.
In countries such as the United Kingdom, there is interest in using electronic government to re-engage citizens with the political process. In particular, this has taken the form of experiments with electronic voting, aiming to increase voter turnout by making voting easy. The UK Electoral Commission has undertaken several pilots, though concern has been expressed about the potential for fraud with some electronic voting methods[2].
Contents
[hide]
* 1 History of E-Government
* 2 Development and implementation issues
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 5 External links
o 5.1 eGovernment news websites
o 5.2 General resources
[edit] History of E-Government
[edit] Development and implementation issues
The development and implementation of e-government involves consideration of its effects on the organisation of the public sector (Cordella, 2007) and on the nature of the services provided by the state including environmental, social, cultural, educational, and consumer issues, among others.
Governments may need to consider the impact by gender, age, language skills, and cultural diversity, as well as the effect on literacy, numeracy, education standards and IT literacy. Economic concerns include the "Digital divide," or the effect of non-use, non-availability or inaccessibility of e-government, or of other digital resources, upon the structure of society, and the potential impact on income and economics.
Economic and revenue-related concerns include e-government's effect on taxation, debt, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), commerce and trade, corporate governance, and its effect on non-e-government business practices, industry and trade, especially Internet Service Providers and Internet infrastructure.
From a technological standpoint, the implementation of e-government has effects on e-enablement, interoperability (e.g., e-GIF) and semantic web issues, "legacy technology" (making "pre-eGovernment IT" work together with or be replaced by e-government systems), and implications for software choices (between open source and proprietary software, and between programming languages) as well as political blogging especially by legislators.
There are also management issues related to service integration, local e-government, and Internet governance including ICANN, IETF and W3C, and financial considerations, such as the cost of implementation / effect on existing budgets, effect on government procurement, and funding.
Legal implications include freedom of information and privacy (e.g. UK Data Protection Act) concerns.
The phrase "e-government" has been a rallying cry for public sector modernization since the 90's, but for many it is now losing its appeal as a slogan or concept. This trend has various drivers. Firstly, there is a wish to mainstream e-government so that best use of technology is integrated into all public sector activity rather than seen as a special interest or add-on. Secondly, many administrations recognise the importance of linking e-government to wider public sector change programmes. Thirdly, the phrase e-government is itself not particularly useful in motivating a change programme. These sorts of considerations have led countries such as the UK to talk of transformational government rather than e-government. Finally, there is the issue of the implications for the public sector of Web 2.0 [3]. All these considerations suggest that e-government is entering a new phase and one in which the term "e-government" is itself becoming less popular.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)